Emergency care for short stay cases in DRG
|Status:||Further active||Start date:||2019-02-14|
|Target version:||Target version 2019|
|Case type:||Major||Owner / responsible:||National organisations|
|MDC:||GEN||Old forum status:|
In order to support a desired intensified investigation of emergency care cases in hospitals, and to reduce incentives for overnight admissions, we have implemented a logic taken into consideration information on emergency care (hastegrad akutt). This information is reported to the Norwegian patient registry and is used in DRG-grouping.
Emergency care cases without admission are in many cases more expensive than short planned outpatient visits (DRGs 9##). We have therefore created a number of DRGs that covers short emergency care cases (980 DRGs).
980A ØH-relaterte tilstander i nervesystemet uten overnatting - MDC 01
980C ØH-relaterte øre-nese-hals-tilstander uten overnatting - MDC 03
980D ØH-relaterte tilstander i nedre luftveier uten overnatting - MDC 04
980E ØH-relaterte hjerte- og kartilstander uten overnatting - MDC 05
980F ØH-relaterte tilstander i fordøyelsessystemet uten overnatting - MDC 06
980H ØH-relaterte muskel- og skjelettilstander uten overnatting - MDC 08
980T ØH-relaterte rusmiddelfremkalte og psykiatriske tilstander som krever somatisk behandling uten overnatting - MDC 19
980U Skader, forgiftninger og utilsiktede medikamentvirkninger uten overnatting - MDC 21
980X Andre ØH-relaterte tilstander uten overnatting - MDC 40
This case is mainly reported as information to other countries, but we also appreciate any comments you might have on this issue.
#1 Updated by Ralph Dahlgren 9 months ago
2019-02-15 Ralph Dahlgren
This way of creating new DRG for emergency care sounds interesting. Norway must have Technical Changes for the Norwegian DRGlogic, is it possible that you can provide these so that we in Sweden can look at them and see if we can test them on Swedish data?
#2 Updated by Kristiina Kahur 9 months ago
2019-2-15 Kristiina Kahur
Ralph has been quick enough to provide comments already.
I would be also interested in description of technical changes to see what are the drivers which determine these specific cases of EC short therapy anda also to see any other information related to grouping rules.
It would be also interesting to know why did you opt for those MDCs and not for any others.
#3 Updated by Kristin Dahlen 9 months ago
Thank you for positive feedback. As you can see from the logic tables there are two different kind of rules/patientgroups in these DRGs. The rules for inpatients (not staying over night) are based on a set of emergency care related diagnosis established in 2014. In 2019 we also included outpatient visit in the DRGs. For this short stays we have a more limited list of diagnosis, and administrative information on emergency care is required. More information can be found in chapter 3.5 in this document (unfortunately only in Norwegian) [[https://helsedirektoratet.no/Documents/Finansieringsordninger/Innsatsstyrt%20finansiering%20%28ISF%29%20og%20DRG-systemet/ISF%202019/ISF%202019%20-%20Grunnlagsdokumentet.pdf]].
#6 Updated by Martti Virtanen 9 months ago
- File Technical changes case #629.xlsx added
2019-03-06 NCC (MV)
This proposal is incomplete.
1) The rules use a property 90X20 that does not exist. It must be added and given to some primary codes or otherwise corrected.
2) There are DRG's that have new names, but DRG's with the same code but different text already exist.
It would be interesting to know what is the basis of selecting the diagnoses wiht 40P81. The same is valid also for 40P80 althoug that has existed for some time.